সোমবার, ২৯ আগস্ট, ২০১১

৩:৩৫:০০ PM

The Bible’s Viewpoint; What Did Jesus Actually Teach?

ABOUT a third of the earth’s population claim to be Christian. Yet, the world seems more politically divided and more violent than ever before. Does this mean that Christianity as Jesus taught it is somehow flawed? Or, rather, does the flaw exist in the way many people apply Christ’s teachings?
This article will examine what Christ actually taught and the example he set for his followers. It will also consider a common view among professed Christians, one that is actually in conflict with the true meaning of Christianity.
A Distorted Form of Christianity
Hundreds of years after Christ’s death, a distorted form of Christianity was made a favored religion in the Roman Empire. No longer unwelcome outsiders, members of this group of professed Christians soon found themselves at the center of the political and social mainstream of Roman society. Church leaders, such as Augustine, reacted to this change by teaching that the awaited Kingdom of God had now arrived. Such leaders taught that their newly acquired political and religious influence was the means of bringing about the will of God on earth. Thus the value of human effort in directing earth’s affairs was emphasized.
As a result, many have come to believe that a Christian has a role to play in the political fabric of society. To do that, most believe, a Christian must at times subordinate certain aspects of his beliefs to the will of the society in which he lives. For example, many people pay lip service to Christ’s teachings of love and peace, while at the same time supporting vicious wars. For the same reason, churches may encourage their followers to pray for the Kingdom of God but at the same time lend support to rulers who act oppressively.
This counterfeit form of Christianity is not the religion that Jesus established. Rather, it is a man-made version and is practiced by most professed Christians today. This version of Christianity has indeed failed, as evidenced by the widespread disregard for Bible principles in all of Christendom today.
What Did Jesus Actually Teach?
It may come as a surprise to some that Jesus actually said that his followers should be “no part of the world, just as [he was] no part of the world.” (John 17:15, 16) Why would Christ encourage his disciples to take such a stand? Jesus’ beloved disciple the apostle John provided an answer. He wrote: “The whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one.”—1 John 5:19.
Hence, Christ’s teachings direct people, not to human entities, but to the heavenly Kingdom of God as the agency that will create a just and righteous world here on earth. (Matthew 6:10) Jesus himself did not show the slightest inclination to interfere with the social structure of his day. He rejected political office outright. (John 6:15) He also rejected violence as a way of settling disputes. (Matthew 26:50-53; John 18:36) Jesus left behind no constitution or canon of civil laws. He took no political stand on the issues of his day. For instance, he did not become an activist for the rights of slaves, nor did he involve himself in the struggle of the Jewish people against Rome.
This does not mean, however, that Jesus was unconcerned about people and their problems. Jesus taught a great deal about an individual’s responsibility toward his fellow man. He encouraged honesty in the payment of taxes and stressed the need to be submissive to those in legitimate positions of authority. (Matthew 22:17-21) He taught how to show an active interest in the welfare of those in need. He also taught how to show respect for the dignity of others and how to be empathetic, forgiving, and merciful. (Matthew, chapters 5-7) It is a well-known fact that the focus of Christ’s teachings is love of God and of neighbor.—Mark 12:30, 31.
True Christianity Today
How, then, would a true follower of Christ conduct himself? He would do as Jesus did. While faithfully obeying the laws of the land, he would remain strictly neutral regarding political affairs. (John 12:47, 48) He would not compromise Christian principles, even when under great pressure. (1 Peter 2:21-23) At the same time, he could not be just a disinterested observer. A true Christian would take an active interest in the welfare of those around him, as Jesus did. (Mark 6:34) He would also expend himself in helping others to lead happier lives by helping them understand and live by Christ’s teachings.—John 13:17.
Accordingly, True Christian today strive to imitate Christ in their relationship with the world around them. While being peaceful law-abiding citizens, they are no part of the world. As Jesus did, they refuse to be part of the violence and political wrangling so common today. Their hope is firmly fixed on the Kingdom of God as the solution to the problems facing the world. True Christianity results in a happier life and harmony among its members. (John 13:34, 35) It certainly has not failed.

রবিবার, ২৮ আগস্ট, ২০১১

৫:৫৩:০০ PM

বন্দি ফ্রেমে স্মৃতির হাতছানি (পর্ব-1)

144/ডি মনিপুরী পাড়া, জর্জ দা সেখানে থাকেন। সবেমাত্র ডাক ও টেলি যোগাযোগ মন্ত্রীর এপিএস হিসাবে জয়েন্ট করেছেন। আমি, প্রনয় 183 তেজকুনিপাড়ায় উঠেছি,সাথে মুক্তদা আর মার্শেল মামা (যাকে আদর করে ডাকতাম পাগলা মামা বলে) মার্শেল মামা নেই, খুব অবেলায় আমাদের ছেড়ে চলে গেল, একটি তরতাজা তরুন অকালেই ঝরে গেল। মার্শেল মামা আমাদের স্মৃতিতে আছে। সুশীলার সাথে বিয়ের সময় আমি গিয়েছিলাম, মামার বিয়েতে প্রচন্ড আনন্দ করেছি, মনে হয়েছে আমার নিজের মামার বিয়েতে আমি এসেছি। সেদিন সুশীলার চোথে মুথে আনন্দের বন্যা বয়ে যাচ্ছিল আজ তার চোথে বরফ জমাট অশ্রুরাশি। সুশীলা আমাদের সহযাত্রি ছিল। আমরা তাকে পেয়েছিলাম আমাদের যাত্রার শুরুতে, যখন আমরা ভেবেছি, আমাদের একতাবদ্ধ হওয়া প্রয়োজন।   আমি, ডেনিস দা ও লরেন্সের আশ্রয়ে ডন বস্কো হোস্টেলে গেষ্ট হিসাবে এসেছি। ইফা মামা, প্রনয়, নেলশনরা পাশের আর একটি হোস্টেল আত্ম-অন্বেষনে থাকে। কারণে ও কারনে জর্জদার কাছে পড়ে থাকা টা যেন আমাদের নিয়মিত রুটিন ছিল। সবাই ঢাকা ইউনিভার্সিটিতে ভর্তি হওয়ার জন্য ব্যস্ত, তখন আমি মেডিক্যালের ওয়েন্টিং লিস্টের দিকে হা মেলে তাকিয়ে আছি, যদি আদিবাসি হিসাবে চান্স পাই! ইতিমধ্যে ডেনিস দা, লিনুস কাকারা ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ের গনযোগাযোগ ও সাংবাদিকতা বিভাগে ভর্তি হয়েছে। লরেন্স জোর প্রস্ততি নিচ্ছে একটা ভাল সাবজেক্টে চান্স পাওয়ার জন্য। আমি আর প্রনয় যেন চিন্তার কোন বালা্য় নেই। যা হবার হবে দেখা যাক। আমোস দা, ফিলিপদা-রা সদরঘাটের ব্যাপ্টিস হোস্টেল থেকে মাঝে মাঝে হানা দেয়। আমি আর প্রনয় যখন তেজকুনিপাড়ায়, তখন একটি পাহাড়সম স্বপ্নের সুচনা হয়েছিল।  ঢাকায় আমাদের প্রথম বাসস্থান । আমাদের স্মৃতিগুলো আজ বড়ো অসহায়। ভোর থেকে রাত অবধি কি ভাবে যে কেটে যেত!  আজ শুধু ই ভাবি। একদিন, সকালে সুর্যটা প্রথর ছিল কিনা জানি না। সেদিন আকাশে এক টুকরো মেঘ ভাসছিল  কিনা তাও জানি না। তবে  মনের মাঝে বিরাট একটি স্বপ্ন জেগে উঠেছিল। মার্শেল মামাকে বললাম। মামা বললেন, খু্ব ভাল কথা বলেছিস ভাগ্নে, কাজে লেগে পড়ি। ডেনিসদা কে বলা হলো, ডেনিসদা রাজি, ইফা মামাকে বলা হলো, আমোস, ফিলিপদাদের জানানো হলো। দিন ঠিক করা হলো। দিনটির ঠিক বিকালে বসলাম আমরা, আমাদের 183 তেজকুনিপাড়ায়। সিদ্ধান্ত হলো আমরা একটি সান্তাল ছাত্র সংগঠন করবো। আমি প্রস্তাব করলাম সান্তাল স্টুডেন্ট ইউনিয়ন (সাসু), নামটি নেয়া হল, আরও কয়েকটি নাম এসেছিল তার মধ্যে থেকে এই নামটি গ্রহন করা হলো। (আমি এক সময় বাংলাদেশ ছাত্র ইউনিয়নের কর্মী ছিলাম, ছাত্র রাজনীতি আর রাজনীতি নামক অসার বিষয়টির সাথে আমার সখ্যতা গড়ে উঠেছিল, তারপর অবশ্য বর্জুয়া শ্রেণীর ছাতার তলে আশ্রয় নিতে হয়েছিল। আমার মনে হয় বাংলাদেশে প্রথম আমিই ছিলাম, যে কিনা একটি কলেজের বৃহৎ রাজনৈতিক দলের ছাত্র সংগঠনের একটি কলেজের প্রতিষ্ঠাতা সাধারণ সম্পাদক নির্বাচিত হয়েছিল, পরবর্তিতে থানা শাখার যুগ্ন সাধারণ সম্পাদক ও জেলা শাখার সদস্য এবং সান্তাল ছাত্র হিসাবে আমিই মনে হয় বাংলাদেশে প্রথম, যে ছাত্র সংসদ নির্বাচনে এজিএস পদে প্রতিদ্বন্দিতা করেছিলাম কিন্তু হেরে গিয়েছিলাম। আজ আমি রাজনীতিকে পছন্দ করি না। আমি নিরপেক্ষ থাকার মন্ত্র শিখেছি এবং ভাল আছি। সেদিন আহবায়ক কমিটি গঠন করা হলো, আহবায়ক কমিটির সভাপতি আমোস মূর্মূ, ডেনিসদা, ইফা, আমি, লরেন্স, প্রনয়, মার্শেল, মুক্ত, নেলশন আরো বেশ কয়েকজন ছিল। শুরু হলো একটি স্বপ্নের পথচলা। শুরু হলো ঢাকায় প্রথম সান্তাল ছাত্র-ছাত্রীদের সংগঠন।  (চলবে)

শনিবার, ২৭ আগস্ট, ২০১১

৭:১২:০০ PM

Gogo then homor

৬:৩৭:০০ PM

আমার মাঝেই থাক


আমার মাঝে তো আমি নেই
খুজে দেথ আমি কোথাই
কোন ভাবাবেগের ছন্দের তালে
কোন ছলনার মিথ্যে আচলে
আমাকে আমি হারিয়ে ফেলিছি
নাকি নিজেরই নিজের কাছে হারিয়ে গিয়েছি।

কোন শ্রাবন সন্ধ্যা তো নয়
বাদলের কান্নায় ছুয়েছে গোধুলী
কোন বিষাদের আকাশ তো নয়
কুয়াশায় ঢেকে দিয়েছে আঁখি
আমার মাছে আমি আমাকে খুজি

যতই খুজি ততই পাই শুধু তোমাকে।
তুমি আমার কি আমার অস্তিত্বের সাথে
তুমি কি আমার হিমোগ্লেবিনের মধ্যে
নাকি চিন্তার আবেশে জড়িয়ে রাখা কায়া।
ঐ শুকনো পাতার দিকে তাকিয়ে
অনেক বুঝার চেষ্টা করেও
পাইনি খুজে শুকিয়ে যাওয়া সেই স্মৃতিগুলোকে।

শুধু অনুভবে বুঝিছি
সে গুলো তো আমার চিন্তার মননে
চিতার আগুন জ্বালিয়ে চলছে
আর দিনের পর দিন পুড়ছে।
আমার অঙ্গার এই দেহতরী
কবে জানি দেখবে ও কুলের
চিরসবুজ পৃথিবী।
তোমার অস্তিত্ব থাক পড়ে থাক
যতনে কিংবা অযতনে
প্রেমে কিংবা অভ্যাসগত হয়ে
পড়ে থাক শয্যার সাথে।
লেপটে থাক বালিশের মধ্যে।

বৃহস্পতিবার, ২৫ আগস্ট, ২০১১

২:২৩:০০ PM

আমার ছবি

ঘনকুয়াশা বাস্কে যখন বিয়ের জন্য তৈরী ছিল

ঘনকুয়াশা বাস্কে হাজারো রঙিন আলোয় আলোকিত

একটি সংবাদ যা এখনো খোলা হয়নি

সংবাদের ভিতরে সংবাদ নিয়ে অনেক প্রশ্ন

লাল অক্ষরে লাল গোলাপ সমেত সংবাদ

অকাল পক্ক, বয়সে বাচ্চা, কিন্তু বুদ্ধিতে পাকা

পিছনে নিলাভ আধার তবুও ফুটে থাকা

আকাশের মাঝে একদিন


বুধবার, ২৪ আগস্ট, ২০১১

২:১৪:০০ AM

Complete Salvation will be in God’s Kingdom.


What Is God’s Kingdom?
Consider the prophecy found at Daniel 2:44. There we read: “In the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin. And the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, and it itself will stand to times indefinite.” What does this tell us about God’s Kingdom?
First, it tells us that God’s Kingdom was to be established “in the days of those kings,” or while other kingdoms still existed. Second, it tells us that the Kingdom will last forever. It will not be conquered and be replaced by some other government. Third, we see that there will be war between God’s Kingdom and the kingdoms of this world. God’s Kingdom will be victorious. In the end, it will be the only government over mankind. Then humans will enjoy the best rulership they have ever known.
The Bible has much to say about that final war between God’s Kingdom and the governments of this world. For example, it teaches that as the end approaches, wicked spirits will spread lies to deceive “the kings of the entire inhabited earth.” For what purpose? “To gather them [the kings] together to the war of the great day of God the Almighty.” The kings of the earth will be gathered together to “the place that is called in Hebrew Har–Magedon.” (Revelation 16:14, 16) Because of what is said in those two verses, the final conflict between human governments and God’s Kingdom is called the battle of Har–Magedon, or Armageddon.
What will God’s Kingdom achieve by means of Armageddon? Think again about what God’s will is for the earth. God purposed that the earth be filled with a righteous, perfect human race serving him in Paradise. What prevents that from happening right now? First, we are sinful, and we get sick and die. however, that Jesus died for us so that we can live forever. Likely you remember the words recorded in the Gospel of John: “God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.”—John 3:16.
Another problem is that many people do wicked things. They lie, cheat, and commit immorality. They do not want to do God’s will. People who do wicked things will be destroyed during God’s war of Armageddon. (Psalm 37:10) Yet another reason why God’s will is not being done on earth is that governments do not encourage people to do it. Many governments have been weak, cruel, or corrupt. The Bible frankly says: “Man has dominated man to his injury.”—Ecclesiastes 8:9.
After Armageddon, mankind will be under just one government, God’s Kingdom. That Kingdom will do God’s will and bring wonderful blessings. For example, it will remove Satan and his demons. (Revelation 20:1-3) The power of Jesus’ sacrifice will be applied so that faithful humans will no longer get sick and die. Instead, under Kingdom rule they will be able to live forever. (Revelation 22:1-3) The earth will be made into a paradise. Thus the Kingdom will cause God’s will to be done on earth and will sanctify God’s name. What does this mean? It means that eventually under God’s Kingdom everyone alive will honor God’s name.
১:৫৯:০০ AM

Does the World Need a “New Evangelization”?

Does the World Need a “New Evangelization”?
THE winds of political change that have been blowing through Eastern Europe have swept along with them a religious reawakening. In order to profit from this spiritual opportunity, the Special Assembly for Europe of the Synod of Bishops convened at the Vatican from November 28 to December 14, 1991. All 137 “Synod Fathers,” who are frontline exponents of the European Catholic hierarchy, met under the banner of “new evangelization.”
From the time that the synod was announced on April 22, 1990, at Velehrad, Czechoslovakia, it was heralded as a historical event. However, it is difficult to think of the synod as a rousing success, since RAI, the Italian national television network, announced on December 14, 1991: “The synod of disappointments has come to its end.”
Why was the synod a disappointment? And does Europe, or the world for that matter, need a “new evangelization”?
“New” in What Sense?
The Catholic hierarchy thinks that a new evangelization is necessary because the religious context is new. Opening the assembly, cardinal Camillo Ruini summarized the way he sees the European arena. He said that in the East “many millions have not even been baptized and ignore the most elementary truths of the Christian faith.” For this reason “the collapse of the Communist regimes opens a great opportunity of evangelization for the Church.” On the other hand, the scene in Western Europe is marked by what he calls a “practical atheism.” No longer is the word of the Catholic Church embraced as truth from God.
The religious reawakening in itself presents another challenge for the bishops. In what way? Both the European and the Latin-American bishops are worried about the proliferation of other religious movements. Why? Evidently because the church has lost many privileged positions she once had, and now she sees herself “threatened by dangerous rivals.” The Jesuit periodical La Civiltà Cattolica pointed to Jehovah’s Witnesses as one such rival because of “the notable number of Catholics and Protestants that they succeed in attracting.”
The words of the synod’s concluding “Declaration” state that the new evangelization is a stimulus to “rediscover one’s own Christian roots.” Why do the Europeans need to rediscover their “Christian roots”? The bishops stated that Christian values are no longer considered valid. “As far as many baptized Europeans are concerned,” said La Civiltà Cattolica, religion “is infantile, a nice fairy tale for the children that adults certainly cannot take seriously, as though it were something that may exercise an influence on their lives. . . . Other Europeans see the Christian religion as simple folklore, destined therefore to disappear as civilization progresses . . . Still other Europeans consider the Christian religion harmful.”
For these reasons the bishops see a need for a “new evangelization.”
Why a Disappointment
In order to succeed in the “new evangelization” of the Old World, a huge work force would be necessary. Yet, one of the greatest problems that has been affecting the church in Europe is the shortage of priests. One of the bishops stated that in the last 13 years, according to recent estimates for Europe, the clergy have decreased in number by 9 percent.
Many considered the synod a disappointment because there were few practical points about how to put the “re-Christianization” of Europe into practice. French bishop Joseph Duval exhorted the synodal assembly: “We should avoid abstract discourses on evangelization . . . All of us talk too much like doctors of the law. May our message rediscover an evangelical simplicity and tone.”
Only a few bishops mentioned the apostolic methods for the evangelizing of people. For instance, Bishop František Tondra of Spiš, Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, said: “For the new evangelization of Europe, we must return to the original form of evangelization. . . . The first Christians, as soon as they were baptized, felt it their duty to spread the Gospel.”

শনিবার, ২০ আগস্ট, ২০১১

৬:৫৮:০০ PM

Salvation

Definition: Preservation or deliverance from danger or destruction. That deliverance may be from the hands of oppressors or persecutors. For all true Christians, God provides through his Son deliverance from the present wicked system of things as well as salvation from bondage to sin and death. For a great crowd of faithful servants of God living during “the last days,” salvation will include preservation through the great tribulation.

Will God, in his great mercy, eventually save all humankind?
Does 2 Peter 3:9 indicate that there will be universal salvation? It says: “The Lord is not slow about his promise as some count slowness, but is forbearing toward you, not wishing that any should perish [“he does not want anyone to be destroyed,” TEV], but that all should reach repentance.” (RS) It is God’s merciful desire that all of Adam’s offspring repent, and he has generously made provision for forgiveness of the sins of those who do. But he does not force anyone to accept that provision. (Compare Deuteronomy 30:15-20.) Many reject it. They are like a drowning man who pushes away a life preserver when it is thrown to him by someone who desires to help. It should be noted, however, that the alternative to repentance is not an eternity in hellfire. As 2 Peter 3:9 shows, those who do not repent will perish, or “be destroyed.” Verse 7 (RS) also refers to “destruction of ungodly men.” There is no thought of universal salvation here.

Does 1 Corinthians 15:22 prove that all humans will eventually be saved? It says: “As in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.” (RS) As shown in the surrounding verses, what is under discussion here is resurrection. Who will be resurrected? All whose death is attributable to Adamic sin (see verse 21) but who have not also personally committed the willful transgressions set forth in Hebrews 10:26-29. As Jesus was raised from Hades (Acts 2:31), so all others who are in Hades will be “made alive” by means of the resurrection. (Rev. 1:18; 20:13) Will all of these gain eternal salvation? That opportunity will be open to them, but not everyone will take hold of it, as is indicated at John 5:28, 29, which shows that the outcome to some will be adverse “judgment.”
What about texts such as Titus 2:11, which refers to “the salvation of all men,” according to the rendering of RS? Other texts, such as John 12:32, Romans 5:18, and 1 Timothy 2:3, 4, convey a similar thought in RS, KJ, NE, TEV, etc. The Greek expressions rendered “all” and “everyone” in these verses are inflected forms of the word pas. As shown in Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words (London, 1962, Vol. I, p. 46), pas can also mean “every kind or variety.” So, in the above verses, instead of “all,” the expression “every kind of” could be used; or “all sorts of,” as is done in NW. Which is correct—“all” or the thought conveyed by “all sorts of”? Well, which rendering is also harmonious with the rest of the Bible? The latter one is. Consider Acts 10:34, 35; Revelation 7:9, 10; 2 Thessalonians 1:9. (Note: Other translators also recognize this sense of the Greek word, as is shown by their renderings of it at Matthew 5:11—“all kinds of,” RS, TEV; “every kind of,” NE; “all manner of,” KJ.)

Are there scriptures that definitely show that some will never be saved?
2 Thess. 1:9, RS: “They shall suffer the punishment of eternal destruction and exclusion from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might.”
Rev. 21:8, RS: “As for the cowardly, the faithless, the polluted, as for murderers, fornicators, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their lot shall be in the lake that burns with fire and sulphur, which is the second death.”
Matt. 7:13, 14, RS: “Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard, that leads to life, and those who find it are few.”

Once a person is saved, is he always saved?
Jude 5, RS: “I desire to remind you, though you were once for all fully informed, that he who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe.”
Matt. 24:13, RS: “He who endures to the end will be saved.” (So a person’s final salvation is not determined at the moment that he begins to put faith in Jesus.)
Phil. 2:12, RS: “As you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” (This was addressed to “the saints,” or holy ones, at Philippi, as stated in Philippians 1:1. Paul urged them not to be overly confident but to realize that their final salvation was not yet assured.)
Heb. 10:26, 27, RS: “If we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.” (Thus the Bible does not go along with the idea that no matter what sins a person may commit after he is “saved” he will not lose his salvation. It encourages faithfulness. See also Hebrews 6:4-6, where it is shown that even a person anointed with holy spirit can lose his hope of salvation.)

Is anything more than faith needed in order to gain salvation?
Eph. 2:8, 9, RS: “By grace [“undeserved kindness,” NW] you have been saved through faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God—not because of works, lest any man should boast.” (The entire provision for salvation is an expression of God’s undeserved kindness. There is no way that a descendant of Adam can gain salvation on his own, no matter how noble his works are. Salvation is a gift from God given to those who put faith in the sin-atoning value of the sacrifice of his Son.)
Heb. 5:9, RS: “He [Jesus] became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him.”  (Does this conflict with the statement that Christians are “saved through faith”? Not at all. Obedience simply demonstrates that their faith is genuine.)
Jas. 2:14, 26, RS: “What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him? For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so faith apart from works is dead.” (A person does not earn salvation by his works. But anyone who has genuine faith will have works to go with it—works of obedience to the commands of God and Christ, works that demonstrate his faith and love. Without such works, his faith is dead.)
Acts 16:30, 31, RS: “‘Men, what must I do to be saved?’ And they [Paul and Silas] said, ‘Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.’” (If that man and his household truly believed, would they not act in harmony with their belief? Certainly.)
১২:২১:০০ AM

*** Religion *** Why are there so many religions? Are all religions acceptable to God?

Religion
Definition: A form of worship. It includes a system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices; these may be personal, or they may be advocated by an organization. Usually religion involves belief in God or in a number of gods; or it treats humans, objects, desires, or forces as objects of worship. Much religion is based on human study of nature; there is also revealed religion. There is true religion and false.

Why are there so many religions?
A recent tabulation concluded that there are 10 main religions and some 10,000 sects. Of these, some 6,000 exist in Africa, 1,200 in the United States, and hundreds in other lands.

Many factors have contributed to the development of new religious groups. Some have said that the various religions all represent different ways of presenting religious truth. But a comparison of their teachings and practices with the Bible indicates, rather, that the diversity of religions is because people have become followers of men instead of listening to God. It is noteworthy that, to a large extent, teachings they hold in common, but that differ from the Bible, originated in ancient Babylon.

Who is the instigator of such religious confusion? The Bible identifies Satan the Devil as “the god of this system of things.” (2 Cor. 4:4) It warns us that “the things which the nations sacrifice they sacrifice to demons, and not to God.” (1 Cor. 10:20) How vitally important, then, to make sure that we really are worshiping the true God, the Creator of heaven and earth, and that our worship is pleasing to him!

Are all religions acceptable to God?
Judg. 10:6, 7: “The sons of Israel again proceeded to do what was bad in the eyes of God, and they began to serve the Baals and the Ashtoreth images and the gods of Syria and the gods of Sidon and the gods of Moab and the gods of the sons of Ammon and the gods of the Philistines. So they left God and did not serve him. At this God’s anger blazed against Israel.” (If a person worships any thing or any person other than the true God, the Creator of heaven and earth, it is evident that his form of worship is not acceptable to God.)

Mark 7:6, 7: “He [Jesus] said to them [the Jewish Pharisees and scribes]: ‘Isaiah aptly prophesied about you hypocrites, as it is written, “This people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far removed from me. It is in vain that they keep worshiping me, because they teach as doctrines commands of men.”’” (Regardless of whom a group profess to worship, if they hold to doctrines of men instead of the inspired Word of God, their worship is in vain.)

Rom. 10:2, 3: “I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God; but not according to accurate knowledge; for, because of not knowing the righteousness of God but seeking to establish their own, they did not subject themselves to the righteousness of God.” (People may have God’s written Word but lack accurate knowledge of what it contains, because they have not been taught properly. They may feel that they are zealous for God, but they may not be doing what he requires. Their worship is not going to please God, is it?)

Is it true that there is good in all religions?
Most religions do teach that a person should not lie or steal, and so forth. But is that sufficient? Would you be happy to drink a glass of poisoned water because someone assured you that most of what you were getting was water?

2 Cor. 11:14, 15: “Satan himself keeps transforming himself into an angel of light. It is therefore nothing great if his ministers also keep transforming themselves into ministers of righteousness.” (Here we are cautioned that not everything that originates with Satan may appear hideous. One of his chief methods of deceiving mankind has been false religion of all kinds, to some of which he gives a righteous appearance.)
2 Tim. 3:2, 5: “Men will be . . . having a form of godly devotion but proving false to its power; and from these turn away.” (Regardless of their outward professions of love for God, if those with whom you worship do not sincerely apply his Word in their own lives, the Bible urges you to break off such association.)

Is it proper to leave the religion of one’s parents?
If what our parents taught us is really from the Bible, we should hold on to it. Even if we learn that their religious practices and beliefs are out of harmony with God’s Word, our parents deserve our respect. But what if you learned that a certain habit of your parents was harmful to health and could shorten a person’s life? Would you imitate them and encourage your children to do so, or would you respectfully share with them what you learned? Similarly, knowledge of Bible truth brings responsibility. If possible, we should share with family members what we learn. We must make a decision: Do we really love God? Do we really want to obey God’s Son? Our doing so may require that we leave the religion of our parents to take up true worship. It certainly would not be fitting to allow our devotion to our parents to be greater than our love for God and Christ, would it? Jesus said: “He that has greater affection for father or mother than for me is not worthy of me; and he that has greater affection for son or daughter than for me is not worthy of me.”—Matt. 10:37.
Josh. 24:14: “Now fear God and serve him in faultlessness and in truth, and remove the gods that your forefathers served on the other side of the River and in Egypt, and serve God.” (That meant a change from the religion of their forefathers, did it not? To serve God acceptably, they had to get rid of any images used in such religion and cleanse their hearts of any desire for those things.)

1 Pet. 1:18, 19: “You know that it was not with corruptible things, with silver or gold, that you were delivered from your fruitless form of conduct received by tradition from your forefathers. But it was with precious blood, like that of an unblemished and spotless lamb, even Christ’s.” (So, early Christians turned away from those traditions of their forefathers, which traditions could never give them eternal life. Gratitude for the sacrifice of Christ made them eager to get rid of anything that caused their lives to be fruitless, lacking real meaning because they did not honor God. Should not we have the same attitude?)

What is the Bible’s viewpoint as to interfaith?
How did Jesus view religious leaders who pretended to be righteous but disrespected God? “Jesus said to them: ‘If God were your Father, you would love me, for from God I came forth and am here. Neither have I come of my own initiative at all, but that One sent me forth. . . . You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a manslayer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of the lie. Because I, on the other hand, tell the truth, you do not believe me. . . . This is why you do not listen, because you are not from God.’”—John 8:42-47.
Would it demonstrate loyalty to God and to his righteous standards if his servants were to embrace in religious brotherhood those who themselves practice what God condemns or who condone such practices? “Quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man. . . . Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men, nor thieves, nor greedy persons, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit God’s kingdom.” (1 Cor. 5:11; 6:9, 10) “Whoever . . . wants to be a friend of the world is constituting himself an enemy of God.” (Jas. 4:4) “O you lovers of God, hate what is bad. He is guarding the souls of his loyal ones.”—Ps. 97:10.
2 Cor. 6:14-17: “Do not become unevenly yoked with unbelievers. For what fellowship do righteousness and lawlessness have? Or what sharing does light have with darkness? Further, what harmony is there between Christ and Belial? Or what portion does a faithful person have with an unbeliever? And what agreement does God’s temple have with idols? . . . ‘“Therefore get out from among them, and separate yourselves,” says God, “and quit touching the unclean thing”’; ‘“and I will take you in.”’”
Rev. 18:4, 5: “I heard another voice out of heaven say: ‘Get out of her, my people, if you do not want to share with her in her sins, and if you do not want to receive part of her plagues. For her sins have massed together clear up to heaven, and God has called her acts of injustice to mind.’”

Is belonging to an organized religion necessary?
Most religious organizations have produced bad fruitage. It is not the fact that groups are organized that is bad. But many have promoted forms of worship that are based on false teachings and are largely ritualistic instead of providing genuine spiritual guidance; they have been misused to control the lives of people for selfish objectives; they have been overly concerned with money collections and ornate houses of worship instead of spiritual values; their members are often hypocritical. Obviously no one who loves righteousness would want to belong to such an organization. But true religion is a refreshing contrast to all of that. Nevertheless, to fulfill the Bible’s requirements, it must be organized.

Heb. 10:24, 25: “Let us consider one another to incite to love and fine works, not forsaking the gathering of ourselves together, as some have the custom, but encouraging one another, and all the more so as you behold the day drawing near.” (To carry out this Scriptural command, there must be Christian meetings that we can attend on a consistent basis. Such an arrangement encourages us to express love toward others, not only concern about self.)
1 Cor. 1:10: “Now I exhort you, brothers, through the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that you should all speak in agreement, and that there should not be divisions among you, but that you may be fitly united in the same mind and in the same line of thought.” (Such unity would never be achieved if the individuals did not meet together, benefit from the same spiritual feeding program, and respect the agency through which such instruction was provided. See also John 17:20, 21.)
1 Pet. 2:17: “Have love for the whole association of brothers.” (Does that include only those who may meet together for worship in a particular private home? Not at all; it is an international brotherhood, as shown by Galatians 2:8, 9 and 1 Corinthians 16:19.)
Matt. 24:14: “This good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then the end will come.” (For all nations to be given the opportunity to hear that good news, the preaching must be carried out in an orderly way, with suitable oversight. Love for God and for one’s fellowman has caused people around the earth to unite their efforts to do this work.)

Is loving one’s fellowman what really counts?
There is no doubt about it, such love is important. (Rom. 13:8-10) But being a Christian involves more than simply being kind to our neighbor. Jesus said that his true disciples would be outstandingly identified by their love for one another, for fellow believers. (John 13:35) The importance of that is emphasized repeatedly in the Bible. (Gal. 6:10; 1 Pet. 4:8; 1 John 3:14, 16, 17) However, Jesus showed that even more important is our love for God himself, which is shown by our obedience to his commandments. (Matt. 22:35-38; 1 John 5:3) To demonstrate such love, we need to study and apply God’s Word and assemble with fellow servants of God for worship.

Is having a personal relationship with God the really important thing?
It certainly is important. Merely attending religious services in a formalistic way cannot take the place of it. But we need to be careful. Why? In the first century, there were people who thought they had a good relationship with God but whom Jesus showed to be badly mistaken. (John 8:41-44) The apostle Paul wrote about some who evidently were zealous about their faith and obviously thought they had a good relationship with God but who did not understand what was really required in order to have God’s approval.—Rom. 10:2-4.
Could we have a good personal relationship with God if we treated as of little importance his commandments? One of these is that we regularly assemble with fellow believers.—Heb. 10:24, 25.

If we personally read the Bible, is that sufficient?
It is true that many people can learn a great deal by reading the Bible personally. If their motive is to learn the truth about God and his purposes, what they are doing is highly commendable. (Acts 17:11) But, being honest with ourselves, are we truly going to grasp the full significance of it all without help? The Bible tells about a man who held a prominent position but who was humble enough to acknowledge his need for help in understanding Bible prophecy. That help was provided by a member of the Christian congregation.—Acts 8:26-38; compare other references to Philip in Acts 6:1-6; 8:5-17.
Of course, if a person reads the Bible but does not apply it in his life, it does him little good. If he believes it and acts on it, he will associate with God’s servants in regular congregation meetings. (Heb. 10:24, 25) He will also join with them in sharing the “good news” with other people.—1 Cor. 9:16; Mark 13:10; Matt. 28:19, 20.

How can a person know which religion is right?
(1) On what are its teachings based? Are they from God, or are they largely from men? (2 Tim. 3:16; Mark 7:7) Ask, for example: Where does the Bible teach that God is a Trinity? Where does it say that the human soul is immortal?
(2) Consider whether it is making known the name of God. Jesus said in prayer to God: “I have made your name manifest to the men you gave me out of the world.” (John 17:6) He declared: “It is God your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.” (Matt. 4:10) Has your religion taught you that ‘it is God you must worship’? Have you come to know the Person identified by that name—his purposes, his activities, his qualities—so that you feel you can confidently draw close to him?
(3) Is true faith in Jesus Christ being demonstrated? This involves appreciation of the value of the sacrifice of Jesus’ human life and of his position today as heavenly King. (John 3:36; Ps. 2:6-8) Such appreciation is shown by obeying Jesus—sharing personally and zealously in the work that he assigned to his followers. True religion has such faith that is accompanied by works.—Jas. 2:26.
(4) Is it largely ritualistic, a formality, or is it a way of life? God strongly disapproves of religion that is merely a formalism. (Isa. 1:15-17) True religion upholds the Bible’s standard of morality and clean speech instead of weakly going along with popular trends. (1 Cor. 5:9-13; Eph. 5:3-5) Its members reflect the fruits of God’s spirit in their lives. (Gal. 5:22, 23) So, those who adhere to true worship can be identified because they sincerely endeavor to apply Bible standards in their lives not only at their places of meeting but in their family life, at their secular work, in school, and in recreation.
(5) Do its members truly love one another? Jesus said: “By this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love among yourselves.” (John 13:35) Such love reaches across racial, social, and national boundaries, drawing people together in genuine brotherhood. So strong is this love that it sets them apart as being truly different. When the nations go to war, who have enough love for their Christian brothers in other lands that they refuse to take up arms and kill them? That is what early Christians did.
(6) Is it truly separate from the world? Jesus said that his true followers would be “no part of the world.” (John 15:19) To worship God in a manner that he approves requires that we keep ourselves “without spot from the world.” (Jas. 1:27) Can that be said of those whose clergy and other members are involved in politics, or whose lives are largely built around materialistic and fleshly desires?—1 John 2:15-17.
(7) Are its members active witnesses concerning God’s Kingdom? Jesus foretold: “This good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then the end will come.” (Matt. 24:14) What religion is really proclaiming God’s Kingdom as the hope of mankind instead of encouraging people to look to human rulership to solve their problems? Has your religion equipped you to share in this activity, and to do it from house to house as Jesus taught his apostles to do?—Matt. 10:7, 11-13; Acts 5:42; 20:20.

শুক্রবার, ১৯ আগস্ট, ২০১১

১০:৫৭:০০ PM

Criticizing Another’s Religion

What Is the Bible’s View?
Criticizing Another’s Religion—Is It Unchristian?
THE Catholic Review, a diocese paper in Baltimore, Maryland, published an article about an American religious group that figured prominently in the local news at the time.
In reaction the paper received a number of complaining letters. Why? In a following issue the editor of the Catholic Review said that those who complained felt “that we have no right, in this ecumenical age, to publish anything that anybody might consider critical of any religious group.” Do you agree?
Many persons would answer “Yes,” saying that ‘there is good in all religions’ or that ‘all religions lead to God.’ For example, Awake! recently published an article that examined Buddhist teachings in the light of the Bible. A Buddhist bishop objected, saying that this is a time for “interracial, international and interreligious understanding.” Yes, many individuals feel that this is the time for a liberal, ecumenical outlook.
However, is this not also a time when honesty and candor are encouraged and needed? And should not this apply in the field of religion too? Some persons do not think so. Jesuit General Pedro Arrupe, as quoted by a Catholic newspaper in Madrid, stated: “I am strictly opposed to any criticism of the Church. . . . It is intolerable that any defect, however real, should be broached publicly by individuals, or groups, regardless of the goodwill they might have.” But, commenting on that statement, The Catholic World said that the head of the Jesuits “was echoing the ideal of a prior age. The Church has turned a corner.” Similarly, one of Europe’s leading Catholic theologians observed: “We do not have to give our assent and amen to everything in the Church. Criticism, indeed loud criticism, can be a duty.”—The Council, Reform and Reunion.
But there is a view that is even more important. What can we conclude from the Bible, especially its record of Christ’s life, as to whether it is unchristian to criticize another’s religion?
Some persons who frown on any such criticizing of religion quote Jesus’ words: “Judge not, that you may not be judged.” (Matt. 7:1, Douay) And Christ went on to tell his listeners to overlook ‘the straw in their brother’s eye’ until they had taken the rafter from their own eye. (Matt. 7:3-5) But what did he mean?
The commentary by Jamieson, Fausset and Brown says: “The context makes it clear that the thing here condemned is that disposition to look unfavourably on the character and actions of others, which leads invariably to the pronouncing of rash, unjust and unlovely judgments upon them.” And, bearing out that Jesus meant a personal type of ‘judging,’ commentator Albert Barnes says that Jesus “refers to private judgment . . . and perhaps primarily to the habits of the scribes and Pharisees.” Jesus’ counsel should be applied by each Christian in not being rash in judging the personal habits and preferences of others. (Compare Romans 14:1-4, 10.) So at Matthew 7:1-5 Jesus was not forbidding the offering of frank Bible-based comments about another religion’s beliefs and practices. How can we be sure? Note Jesus’ own example.
On one occasion Jesus spoke about certain Jewish religious leaders who paid more attention to their traditions than to following the principles of God’s word. Did Christ carefully avoid criticizing another’s religion? On the contrary, he said: “In this way you have made God’s word null and void by means of your tradition. Hypocrites! It was you Isaiah meant when he so rightly prophesied: ‘This people honours me only with lip-service, while their hearts are far from me. The worship they offer me is worthless.’” (Matt. 15:6-9, Jerusalem Bible) What is your reaction to such critical words? They might offend the sensibilities of some persons. But was Jesus being “unchristian”? Obviously not.
Perhaps even more pointed is his discourse in Matthew chapter 23. He called the religious leaders “blind fools,” “blind leaders” and ‘serpents, a brood of vipers.’ (Matt. 23:16, 17, 24, 33, Knox) Should we be shocked by such words? Again, was Jesus being “unchristian”? Roman Catholic priest Bruce Vawter, CM, says that this “discourse is somewhat embarrassing both in its length and in its harshness, but it must be faced up to both as an historical record and as part of the Gospel message.”—The Four Gospels: An Introduction.
But ask yourself: Why did Jesus publicly criticize religious men who claimed to serve the same God he preached? Was his motive bad? Not at all. Though he was mild-tempered and kind, his love for righteousness and his desire to aid honest-hearted persons moved him to criticize those who were teaching or acting contrary to God’s revealed will.—Matt. 11:28-30; Heb. 1:9.
Also, Jesus’ frank comments could help persons. For example, what if, in learning to use a dangerous machine, you kept making a serious error. Would you not be benefited if someone corrected you before you hurt or killed yourself or others? Accordingly, Jews hearing Jesus’ truthful criticism could be helped on the way to God’s approval and salvation.
Was it only Christ who could properly make such comments? No, for the Bible shows clearly that Jesus’ disciples also called attention to religious error. For example, read Stephen’s bold denunciation of the Jewish leaders. (Acts 7:51-54) And note that the apostle Paul branded the Athenian worship of idols as “ignorance.” (Acts 17:29, 30) Further, out of love for truth these first-century Christians exposed deviations from true Christianity by ones professing to be Christians.—1 Tim. 1:19, 20; 2 Tim. 2:16-19.
What, though, if you had lived then and Jesus’ followers criticized the religion of your friends and relatives? As now, it would have been easy to take offense. Still, we cannot deny that the disciples’ comments—critical though they were—were right, and they are included in God’s Word. As with Jesus, the motive behind the criticism was good. So the disciples were being Christian—not unchristian—in pointing out religious error.
Consequently, is it unchristian today to offer Bible-based comments about another’s religion? The Scriptural answer must be No. True, criticism that reveals faults in the teachings or practices of someone’s religion might at first seem severe. Yet, how should one react? Not like those who became violently enraged over Stephen’s criticism. Rather, note the fine reaction of some Athenians who heard Paul’s comments. They accepted the Bible truth and became believers, to their eternal benefit.—Compare Acts 17:11, 12.
Far from being rejected as unchristian, then, criticism based on God’s Word should be carefully considered, for it can bring real benefits.

রবিবার, ১৪ আগস্ট, ২০১১

৪:৩৮:০০ PM

তুমি চাইলে

তুমি চাইলে
সবকিছুই হতে পারতো
খর রোদ্রটা ভালবাসার শীতল ছায়ায় ভরে দেয়া যেত
না হওয়া কাজটা, খুব সহজেই করা যেত
না বলা কথাটাও, অজান্তেই বলা হয়ে যেত
প্রখর রোদেও, মাইল এর পর মাইল হাটা যেত
প্রচন্ড শীতেও, উষ্ঞতা পাওয়া যেত
প্রচন্ড ঘুমটা উপেক্ষা, রাত জাগা যেত
বইয়ের পৃষ্ঠাগুলো, প্রেম শয্যা বানানো যেত
বলপেনের ঠোঁট থেকে, শুধুই ভালাবাসা ছিটানো যেত
সেনাবাহিনী বন্দুক নয়, ফুল দিয়ে সম্ভাদন জানাতো
ছিচকে চোরটা, আর চুরি করতো না
ছিনতাইকারী, জিনিষ নিয়ে পালাতো না
দূঃখ গুলোকে, ফানুস বানিয়ে উড়িয়ে দেয়া যেত
কষ্ঠগুলোকে, বদ্ধঘরে তালা মেরে রেখে দেয়া যেত
না পাওয়া বেদনাগুলোকেও, খুব সহজে ভোলা যেত
বহুদুর হেটে আসা রাস্তাটাকে, ভালবাসা যেত
সরকার বিরোধী আন্দোলনগুলোকে, থামানো যেত
মন্ত্রীদের মিথ্যা আশ্বাসগুলোকে, বন্ধ করা যেত
জাতিগত বিদ্বেষগুলোকে, শেষ করা যেত
সত্য ধর্মটাকে, খুজে পাওয়া যেত
এখন থেকে, মৃতু্ পর্যন্ত একসাথে থাকা যেত।
শুধু তুমি চাইলে। 



 


 



সোমবার, ৮ আগস্ট, ২০১১

২:১১:০০ PM

বাইরে বৃষ্টি

টুপ টাপ টুপ টাপ
মনের ভিতর উত্তাপ

উন্মাদনা বাইরে নয়, ভিতরে
শৈত্যের মাঝেও উষ্ঞতা
বিষণতার মাঝেও চঞ্চলতা

অনেক হারাবার মাঝেও
পাওয়ার আকুলতা

পিচ্ছিল পথে হাটবার আকাঙ্খা
পড়ে যাওয়ার ভয়টাকে দুরে ফেলা

হৃদয়ের ঝড়টাকে
অল ইজ ওয়েল দিয়ে ঢেকে রাখা

বৃষ্টির সাথে আমারও মিল
ঝরেই আনন্দ
পাওয়ার আশায় নয়

বৃষ্টি তুমি আমার
কিন্তু আমি তোমার নয়।

About

Ghonokuasha Baskey is a Santal writer of Bangladesh. He has started writing since 1985.