Christendom
Development:
A Period of
Darkness—The Rise of Christendom
In time, the
Christian congregation faced a period of dramatic changes. As foretold in the
Bible, false Christians infiltrated God’s organization and became a lawless
influence, bringing in teachings and practices that were unscriptural.—Matthew
13:24-30, 36-43; Acts 20:29, 30; 2 Thessalonians 2:6-8; 1 Timothy
4:1-3; 2 Timothy 2:16-18; 2 Peter 2:1-3.
In the
first-century Christian congregation, there were no class distinctions. By the
second century, a hierarchy of bishops and presbyters had come into existence,
resulting in a separation of clergy and laity. Next, such pagan doctrines as
the Trinity, the immortality of the soul, and hellfire came to be accepted by
those who claimed to be Christians. Then, in 313 C.E., Roman Emperor
Constantine ordered that this apostate form of Christianity be recognized as a
lawful religion. By the end of the fourth century, the “Christian” Church,
which was actively meddling in politics, was promoted to be the official
religion of the Roman Empire, and it became known as the Roman Catholic Church.
In the
16th century, the Reformation brought new developments to the religious
scene in Europe. Reformers, such as Martin Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, and John
Calvin, attacked the Catholic Church on various issues. As a result, religious
groups sprang up, breaking free from the papal authority of Rome. Later these
groups became known as Protestants (protesters against the Roman Catholic
Church).
Even though the
various Protestant churches are organized differently, they have basically
retained the separation of clergy and laity. They also continue to teach such
unscriptural doctrines as the Trinity, the immortality of the soul, eternal
torment in a fiery hell, and others. On the matter of Christian neutrality,
Protestants do not differ from Catholics. They remain a part of the world.
While the Protestant Reformation did bring about some changes, it did not mark
a return to true Christianity. However, in a parable, Jesus Christ foretold
that the time would come when true Christianity would be restored and wheatlike
true Christians would “shine as brightly as the sun.”—Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43.
1st and 2nd centuries (Apostolic Fathers):
BY THE start of
the second century C.E., false teachings had begun to muddy the clear waters of
Christian truth. Just as inspired prophecy had foretold, after the death of the
apostles, certain ones abandoned the truth and turned instead to “myths.”
(2 Timothy 4:3, 4, footnote) About 98 C.E., John, the last surviving
apostle, warned of such erroneous teachings and of people “who [were] trying to
mislead” faithful Christians.—1 John 2:26; 4:1, 6.
2nd century onward (apostasy):
In the middle of
the second century C.E., professed Christians were defending their faith
against Roman persecutors and heretics alike. However, this was an era of too
many theological voices. Religious debates regarding the “divinity” of Jesus
and the nature and workings of the holy spirit caused more than just intellectual
rifts. Bitter disagreements and irreparable divisions over “Christian” doctrine
spilled over into the political and cultural spheres, at times causing riots,
rebellion, civil strife, even war. Writes historian Paul Johnson: “[Apostate]
Christianity began in confusion, controversy and schism and so it continued.
. . . The central and eastern Mediterranean in the first and second
centuries AD swarmed with an infinite multitude of religious ideas, struggling
to propagate themselves. . . . From the start, then, there were
numerous varieties of Christianity which had little in common.”
2nd century onward (Greek philosophy absorbed):
The Church Fathers—Advocates of Bible
Truth?
In the middle of
the second century C.E., professed Christians were defending their faith
against Roman persecutors and heretics alike. However, this was an era of too
many theological voices. Religious debates regarding the “divinity” of Jesus
and the nature and workings of the holy spirit caused more than just
intellectual rifts. Bitter disagreements and irreparable divisions over
“Christian” doctrine spilled over into the political and cultural spheres, at
times causing riots, rebellion, civil strife, even war. Writes historian Paul
Johnson: “[Apostate] Christianity began in confusion, controversy and schism
and so it continued. . . . The central and eastern Mediterranean in
the first and second centuries AD swarmed with an infinite multitude of
religious ideas, struggling to propagate themselves. . . . From the
start, then, there were numerous varieties of Christianity which had little in
common.”
2nd through 5th centuries (Church Fathers):
During that era,
writers and thinkers who felt that it was imperative to interpret “Christian”
teachings using philosophical terms began to flourish. To satisfy educated
pagans who were new converts to “Christianity,” such religious writers relied
heavily on earlier Greek and Jewish literature. Beginning with Justin Martyr
(c. 100-165 C.E.), who wrote in Greek, professed Christians became increasingly
sophisticated in their assimilation of the philosophical heritage of the Greek
culture.
This trend came to
fruition in the writings of Origen (c. 185-254 C.E.), a Greek author from
Alexandria. Origen’s treatise On First Principles was the
first systematic effort to explain the main doctrines of “Christian” theology
in terms of Greek philosophy.
Recently, Greek
Orthodox Metropolitan Methodius of Pisidia wrote the book The Hellenic
Pedestal of Christianity in order to show that Greek
culture and philosophy provided the infrastructure of modern “Christian”
thought. In that book, he unhesitantly admits: “Almost all the prominent Church
Fathers considered the Greek elements most useful, and they borrowed them from
the Greek classical antiquity, using them as a means to understand and
correctly express the Christian truths.”
4th century onward (part of world):
IN TIME the Roman
Empire, in which early Christianity began, collapsed. Many historians claim
that that collapse was also the time of the final victory of Christianity over
paganism. Expressing a different viewpoint, Anglican bishop
E. W. Barnes wrote: “As classical civilization collapsed,
Christianity ceased to be the noble faith of Jesus the Christ: it became a
religion useful as the social cement of a world in dissolution.”—The Rise
of Christianity.
Before that
collapse, during the second, third, and fourth centuries C.E., history records
that in many ways those who claimed to follow Jesus kept themselves separate
from the Roman world. But it also reveals the development of apostasy in
doctrine, conduct, and organization, just as Jesus and his apostles had
foretold. (Matthew 13:36-43; Acts 20:29, 30; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12;
2 Timothy 2:16-18; 2 Peter 2:1-3, 10-22) Eventually compromises came
to be made with the Greco-Roman world, and some who claimed to be Christian
adopted the world’s paganism (such as its festivals and its worship of a
mother-goddess and a triune god), its philosophy (such as belief in an immortal
soul), and its administrative organization (seen in the appearance of a clergy
class). It was this corrupted version of Christianity that attracted the pagan
masses and became a force that the Roman emperors first tried to stamp out but
later came to terms with and endeavored to use to their own ends.
5th century onward (Eastern and Western church):
Apostasy—The Way to God Blocked ***
Divisive debates
about aspects of the still-developing Trinity teaching continued to cause
turmoil in Christendom. Another council was held in 451 C.E. at Chalcedon
to define the character of Christ’s “natures.” While the West accepted the
creed issued by this council, Eastern churches disagreed, leading to the
formation of the Coptic Church in Egypt and Abyssinia and the “Jacobite”
churches of Syria and Armenia. The unity of the Catholic Church was constantly
threatened by divisions on abstruse theological matters, especially regarding
the definition of the Trinity doctrine.
Another cause for
division was the veneration of images. During the eighth century, the Eastern
bishops rebelled against this idolatry and entered into what is called their
iconoclastic, or image-destroying, period. In time they returned to the use of
icons.—Exodus 20:4-6; Isaiah 44:14-18.
A further big test
came about when the Western church added the Latin word filioque (“and
from the Son”) to the Nicene Creed to indicate that the Holy Spirit proceeded
from both the Father and the Son. The end result of this sixth-century
emendation was a rift when “in 876 a synod [of bishops] at Constantinople
condemned the pope both for his political activities and because he did not
correct the heresy of the filioque clause. This action was part of the
East’s entire rejection of the pope’s claim of universal jurisdiction over the
Church.” (Man’s Religions) In the year 1054, the pope’s
representative excommunicated the patriarch of Constantinople, who in return
put a curse on the pope. That split eventually led to the formation of the
Eastern Orthodox Churches—Greek, Russian, Romanian, Polish, Bulgarian, Serbian,
and other self-governing churches.
11th century onward (Crusades and Inquisition):
Persecution of the Albigenses
Yet another movement got started in the
12th century in the south of France—the Albigenses (also known as
Cathari), named after the town of Albi, where they had many followers. They had
their own celibate clergy class, who expected to be greeted with reverence.
They believed that Jesus spoke figuratively in his last supper when he said of
the bread, “This is my body.” (Matthew 26:26, NAB) They rejected the
doctrines of the Trinity, the Virgin Birth, hellfire, and purgatory. Thus they
actively put in doubt the teachings of Rome. Pope Innocent III gave
instructions that the Albigenses be persecuted. “If necessary,” he said, “suppress
them with the sword.”
A crusade was mounted against the “heretics,”
and the Catholic crusaders massacred 20,000 men, women, and children in
Béziers, France. After much bloodshed, peace came in 1229, with the Albigenses
defeated. The Council of Narbonne “forbade the possession of any part of the
Bible by laymen.” The root of the problem for the Catholic Church was evidently
the existence of the Bible in the language of the people.
The next step that
the church took was to establish the Inquisition, a tribunal set up to suppress
heresy. Already a spirit of intolerance possessed the people, who were
superstitious and all too willing to lynch and murder “heretics.” The
conditions in the 13th century lent themselves to the abuse of power by
the church. However, “heretics condemned by the Church were to be delivered to
the ‘secular arm’—the local authorities—and burned to death.” (The Age
of Faith) By leaving the actual executions to the secular
authorities, the church would ostensibly be free of bloodguilt. The Inquisition
started an era of religious persecution that resulted in abuses, false and
anonymous denunciations, murder, robbery, torture, and the slow death of
thousands who dared to believe differently from the church. Freedom of
religious expression was stifled.
15th century onward (missionary activity):
When “Christians” and “Heathens” Met
“Religion’s in the heart, not in the knees”—D.
W. Jerrold, 19th-century English playwright
MISSIONARY
activity, a distinguishing mark of early Christianity, was in keeping with
Jesus’ command to “make disciples of people of all the nations” and to be
witnesses of him “to the most distant part of the earth.”—Matthew
28:19, 20; Acts 1:8.
In the 15th
century, Christendom embarked on a global program to convert the “heathen.”
What kind of religion had these “heathen” peoples been practicing up until that
time? And did any subsequent conversion to “Christianity” touch their heart or
only cause them to drop to their knees in formal submission?
In Africa there
are an estimated 700 ethnic groups south of the Sahara. Originally, each had
its own tribal religion, although their similarities betray a common origin. In
Australia, the Americas, and the isles of the Pacific, dozens of other
indigenous religions are to be found.
Most believe in
one supreme god and yet, polytheistically, still make room for any number of
lesser deities—family, clan, or communal gods. One study made of the Aztec
religion lists more than 60 distinct and interrelated names of deities.
In Africa and the
Americas, people with the most “primitive” religions believe in a supernatural
figure known as the Trickster. At times described as the cosmic creator, at
other times as a rearranger of creation, he is always viewed as slyly deceptive
and lustful, although not necessarily malicious. The North American Navaho
Indians say that he ordained death; the Oglala Lakota tribe teaches that he is
a fallen angel who caused the first humans to be banished from paradise by
promising them a better life elsewhere. The Encyclopedia of
Religion says that the Trickster often appears in “stories of creation,”
playing “opposite a spiritual creator-deity.”
Reminiscent of
Babylon and Egypt, some native religions teach a trinity. The book The Eskimos
says that the Spirit of the Air, the Spirit of the Sea, and the Spirit of the
Moon form a trinity that “ultimately controlled practically everything in the
Eskimo environment.”
16th century onward (Reformation and Protestantism):
In the
16th century, the Reformation brought new developments to the religious
scene in Europe. Reformers, such as Martin Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, and John
Calvin, attacked the Catholic Church on various issues. As a result, religious
groups sprang up, breaking free from the papal authority of Rome. Later these
groups became known as Protestants (protesters against the Roman Catholic
Church).
17th century onward (world change):
Christendom Grapples With World Change
“Philosophy and religion are irreconcilable.”—Georg
Herwegh, 19th-century German poet
“PHILOSOPHY,” a
word derived from Greek roots meaning “love of wisdom,” is difficult to define.
While doubting that “a universal and all-inclusive definition” can be made, The
New Encyclopædia Britannica ventures that “a first attempt
in this direction might be to define philosophy either as ‘a reflection upon
the varieties of human experience’ or as ‘the rational, methodical, and
systematic consideration of those topics that are of greatest concern to man.’”
These definitions
clearly show why true religion and philosophy are irreconcilable. True
religion is based upon divine revelation, not upon “the varieties of human
experience.” First and foremost, it revolves around the interests of the
Creator, not around the “topics that are of greatest concern to man.” False
religion, on the other hand, like philosophy, is based on human experience and
puts human interests uppermost. This fact became particularly evident from the
17th century onward as Christendom grappled with world change.
19th century onward (philosophical and scientific challenges):
An Age of “Enlightenment” and Industrialization
In 1848, Karl Marx
and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto.
Instead of advocating religion, which Marx called “the opium of the people,”
they advocated atheism. While ostensibly against all religion, they actually
fostered the religion, or worship, of the State and its leaders.
About a decade
later, in 1859, Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species was
published; it deeply influenced the scientific and religious thinking of the
time. The theories of evolution led to a challenging of the truthfulness of the
Bible’s account of creation and of the introduction of sin through the
disobedience of the first human pair. (Gen., chaps. 1-3) As a result, faith of
many in the Bible was undermined.
19th century onward (restoration of true worship imminent):
Stirrings of Watchfulness
In the 19th
century, though, the religious climate led to stirrings of Christian
watchfulness. As a result of Bible research on the part of some clergymen and
Bible scholars, such teachings as the immortal soul, eternal torment after
death, predestination, and the Trinity were restudied. In addition, some
students of the Bible were closely examining Bible prophecies pertaining to the
last days. Consequently, various groups of persons began thinking seriously
about the Lord’s promised return.—Matt. 24:3.
In the United
States, William Miller predicted the return of Christ in visible form in 1843
or 1844. The German theologian J. A. Bengel set the date for 1836;
the Irvingites in England looked first to 1835, then 1838, 1864, and 1866.
There was a Mennonite group in Russia that looked first to 1889, then to 1891.
Belief in fatalism:
“Christian” Debates About Fate
The early
Christians lived in a culture strongly influenced by Greek and Roman ideas of
destiny and fate. The so-called Church Fathers, for example, drew heavily upon
the works of such Greek philosophers as Aristotle and Plato. One problem they
tried to resolve was, How could an all-knowing, all-powerful God, “the One
telling from the beginning the finale,” be reconciled with a God of love?
(Isaiah 46:10; 1 John 4:8) If God knew the end from the beginning, they
reasoned, then surely he foreknew man’s fall into sin and the disastrous consequences
this would bring.
Origen, one of the
most prolific of the early Christian writers, argued that one of the important
elements to keep in mind was the notion of free will. “There are, indeed,
innumerable passages in the Scriptures which establish with exceeding clearness
the existence of freedom of will,” he wrote.
Origen said that
ascribing to some exterior force the responsibility for our acts “is neither
true nor in conformity with reason, but is the statement of him who wishes to
destroy the conception of free will.” Origen argued that while God can foreknow
events chronologically, this does not mean that he causes an event or that any
necessity is placed upon it to happen. However, not all agreed.
An influential
Church Father, Augustine (354-430 C.E.), complicated the argument by
reducing the part that free will plays in events. Augustine gave predestination
its theological basis in Christendom. His works, primarily De libero
arbitrio, were central to discussions in the Middle Ages. The debate
eventually reached a climax in the Reformation, with Christendom deeply divided
over the issue of predestination.
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন